Rodriguez-Senum v. Colorado et al
| Melissa Diane Rodriguez-Senum |
| Tim Waltz, State of Minnesota, Colorado State and Waltz |
| 1:2022cv02826 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order of Dismissal. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ORDERED that the #1 Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and cure the deficiency as directed. IFP on appeal is denied. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/7/2022. (jtorr, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCY. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/28/2022. (jtorr, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tim Waltz, State of Minnesota filed by Melissa Diane Rodriguez-Senum. (blaws) Modified on 10/27/2022 to correct docket entry (blaws). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
