Zeng v. Man Khi Lam, Inc. et al
Xun Yu Zeng |
Man Khi Lam, Inc. and Wei Feng Huang |
1:2022cv02852 |
October 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
William J Martinez |
Scott T Varholak |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint Attorney Dan S. Cross added to party Wei Feng Huang(pty:dft), Attorney Dan S. Cross added to party Man Khi Lam, Inc.(pty:dft) by Wei Feng Huang, Man Khi Lam, Inc..(Cross, Dan) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xun Yu Zeng. All Defendants. (Wang, Yun) |
|
|
|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02852-WJM. (athom, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (blaws) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Defendants by Plaintiff Xun Yu Zeng. (Attachments: #1 Case Cover Sheet)(Wang, Yun) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Xun Yu Zeng (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8750908)Attorney Yun Y. Wang added to party Xun Yu Zeng(pty:pla), filed by Xun Yu Zeng. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Exhibit 1)(Wang, Yun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.