Colluru v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Viswa Teja Saraschand Colluru |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and John E. Roessler |
| 1:2022cv02853 |
| November 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion to Reset Conference. Pursuant to Plaintiff's unopposed request, the status conference set for 12/22/2022 is VACATED and RESET 1/19/2023 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/14/2022. Text Only Entry(stvlc4, )
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Hearing by Plaintiff Viswa Teja Saraschand Colluru. (Hacking, James) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #8 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/12/2022. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, John E. Roessler, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services All parties consent.. (Brown, Logan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant(s) Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 11/14/2022, answer due 1/13/2023; John E. Roessler served on 11/14/2022, answer due 1/13/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 11/14/2022, answer due 1/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS RECEIPTS)(Hacking, James) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, available from the Court's website at www.cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 12/8/2022. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is set for a Status Conference on 12/22/2022 at 9:45 in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/2/2022. Text Only Entry (stvlc4, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02853-STV. (athom, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, John E. Roessler, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8751105)Attorney James O. Hacking, III added to party Viswa Teja Saraschand Colluru(pty:pla), filed by Viswa Teja Saraschand Colluru. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons SUMMONS USCIS, #3 Summons SUMMONS USCIS DIRECTOR, #4 Summons SUMMONS USCIS LOCAL, #5 Summons SUMMONS ATT. GRAL., #6 Summons SUMMONS US ATT.)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
