Olson v. GrowGeneration Corp. et al
| Jonathan C. Olson |
| GrowGeneration Corp. and GrowGeneration Michigan Corp. |
| 1:2022cv02897 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/08/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/2/2023. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 2/9/2023 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (alave, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/28/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER: Upon review of the #8 Plaintiff's Response to Second Show Cause Order and the #9 Second Amended Complaint, the Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged complete diversity of the Parties in this case, and thus, he has sufficiently established this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, the #4 Order to Show Cause is hereby DISCHARGED. With respect to the Second Amended Complaint, the Court notes that Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a party "may amend its pleading once as a matter of course." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1) (emphasis added). Plaintiff used his one amendment as a matter of course when he filed his #6 First Amended Complaint on November 17, 2022. However, because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are to be "construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," see Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, the Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff leave to amend his First Amended Complaint, and the Second Amended Complaint is accepted as filed. Plaintiff is advised that should he seek any further amendments of his pleading, a formal motion that complies with the Federal Rules and the Local Rules of Practice will be required. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/28/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 9 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jonathan C. Olson.(Kuhn, Bryan) Modified on 11/29/2022 add text (trvo, ). |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #7 by Plaintiff Jonathan C. Olson. (Kuhn, Bryan) |
|
Filing 7
DISCHARGED SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE on or before November 28, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/18/2022. (trvo, ) Modified on 11/29/2022 to discharge pursuant to 10 Minute Order (trvo, ).
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jonathan C. Olson.(Kuhn, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #4 by Plaintiff Jonathan C. Olson. (Kuhn, Bryan) |
|
Filing 4
DISCHARGED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE on or before November 18, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/8/2022. (trvo, ) Modified on 11/29/2022 to discharge pursuant to 10 Minute Order (trvo, ).
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8765756)Attorney Bryan E. Kuhn added to party Jonathan C Olson(pty:pla), filed by Jonathan C Olson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kuhn, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
