Desmond v. Weiser et al
| Dr. Williams |
| Gareth Desmond |
| Weiser and Ensley |
| 1:2022cv03021 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #5 Order on 1/3/2023. (sdunb, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ORDERED that the #1 Motion Requesting a Tolling of Time is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Movant failed to cure the deficiencies as directed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that IFP on appeal is denied. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/3/2023. (sdunb, )
|
| Filing 4 LETTER by Petitioner Gareth Desmond. (sdunb, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies. If Petitioner fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/21/2022. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 MOTION Requesting a Tolling of Time by Petitioner Gareth Desmond. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (blaws) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
