Nicodemus v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Darren L. Nicodemus |
SSA Noticing and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
USAO-SS-Noticing |
1:2022cv03127 |
December 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Social Security - SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Darren L. Nicodemus. (sphil, ) |
![]() |
Filing 1 [DISREGARD: ENTERED IN CASE IN ERROR] Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) Modified on 12/6/2022 to indicate erroneous entry (blaws). |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
Filing 5 LETTER by Plaintiff Darren L. Nicodemus. (blaws) |
Filing 4 PLAINTIFF's MOTION for Extension of Time or Continuance by Plaintiff Darren L. Nicodemus. (blaws) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Darren L. Nicodemus. (blaws) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review of Social Security Decision against Commissioner, Social Security Administration filed by Darren L. Nicodemus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (blaws) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.