Roldan et al v. NewRez, LLC
| Genaro R. Roldan and Claudia S. Roldan |
| NewRez, LLC |
| 1:2022cv03168 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 CERTIFICATE of Service by Mail by Clerk of Court re #26 COURTROOM MINUTES, to Genaro R. Roldan 1411 Rushmore Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80910 and Claudia S. Roldan 1411 Rushmore Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80910. Text Only Entry (csarr, ) |
| Filing 26 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 1/25/2023 before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell: The Court hears additional argument on the parties respective positions regarding the Defendant's #15 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling ON Motion to Dismiss. For reasons put forth on the record, the #15 Motion is GRANTED and discovery is STAYED. Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report within 10 days of a final ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. FTR: Courtroom 101. (evau, ) |
Filing 25
ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion: A Hearing on the #15 Motion to Stay Discovery is SET for January 25, 2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. The Hearing will be conducted entirely BY VIDEO, and all necessary parties SHALL attend by that means. Please see the attached instructions on how to participate by video means. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 01/11/23. Text Only Entry (mdblc2)
|
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to #15 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant NewRez, LLC. (Haywood, Taylor) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE to #15 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiffs Claudia S. Roldan, Genaro R. Roldan. (trvo, ) |
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER: The proposed scheduling order deadline is VACATED, to be reset if necessary upon a ruling on the #15 Motion to Stay. Plaintiffs shall file a response to the #15 Motion to Stay, on or before January 10, 2023. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 12/22/22. Text Only Entry (mdblc2)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER: The #11 Motion for Production of Documents; and the #12 Request for Admission are both DENIED. To the extent that Plaintiffs are asking to obtain discovery from Defendant, the request is premature, as a scheduling order has not yet been entered and discovery has not yet commenced. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 12/21/22. Text Only Entry(mdblc2)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant NewRez, LLC. (Haywood, Taylor) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/24/2023. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 12/20/2022. (evaug)
|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Service by Mail by Clerk of Court re 16 Memorandum, 14 Memorandum, 13 Order to Claudia S. Roldan and Genaro R. Roldan at 1411 Rushmore Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80910. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss filed by NewRez, LLC. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/20/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc4, ) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motion to Dismiss by Defendant NewRez, LLC. (Haywood, Taylor) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM regarding Defendant's #8 Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs' #11 Motion for Production of Documents and #12 Request for Admission. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/20/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc4,) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/20/2022. Text Only Entry. (nywlc4, )
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition to #8 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiffs Claudia S. Roldan, Genaro R. Roldan. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 12 Request for Admission by Plaintiffs Claudia S. Roldan, Genaro R. Roldan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Letter)(trvo, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Production of Documents by Plaintiffs Claudia S. Roldan, Genaro R. Roldan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (trvo, ) |
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFFS' CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiffs Claudia S. Roldan, Genaro R. Roldan (trvo, ) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant NewRez, LLC All parties do not consent.. (Haywood, Taylor) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant NewRez, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Warranty Deed)(Haywood, Taylor) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons upon Newrez, LLC on 11/22/2022 (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against NewRez, LLC, filed by Genaro R. Roldan, Claudia S. Roldan.(jcharl, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Megan K. Bruyns on behalf of NewRez, LLCAttorney Megan K. Bruyns added to party NewRez, LLC(pty:dft) (Bruyns, Megan) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Shellpoint Partners LLC, Corporate Parent NRM Acquisition LLC, Corporate Parent NRM Acquisition II LLC, Corporate Parent New Residential Mortgage LLC, Corporate Parent Rithm Capital Corp. for NewRez, LLC. (Haywood, Taylor) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NewRez, LLC from In The District Court of El Paso County, Case Number 2022CV000425. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8818503), filed by NewRez, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint in Case No. 2022CV425, #2 Exhibit B - Summons in Case No. 2022CV425, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Service in Case No. 2022CV425, #4 Exhibit D - Docket in Case No. 2022CV000425, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Haywood, Taylor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
