Garcia v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Juan Garcia
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company doing business as Owners Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv03183
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2022 Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER to #4 Complaint and Jury Demand by Auto-Owners Insurance Company.(Mereness, John)
December 13, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Taylor Robert Seibel on behalf of Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Seibel, Taylor)
December 13, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John David Mereness on behalf of Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyAttorney John David Mereness added to party Auto-Owners Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Mereness, John)
December 12, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brett Emil Myers on behalf of Juan GarciaAttorney Brett Emil Myers added to party Juan Garcia(pty:pla) (Myers, Brett)
December 12, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John G. Taussig, III on behalf of Juan GarciaAttorney John G. Taussig, III added to party Juan Garcia(pty:pla) (Taussig, John)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12 December 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/15/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 2/22/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/12/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
December 9, 2022 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jcharl, )
December 9, 2022 Filing 4 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Auto-Owners Insurance Company, filed by Juan Garcia.(jcharl, )
December 9, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, )
December 9, 2022 Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jcharl, )
December 9, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Auto-Owners Insurance Company from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2022-cv-30778. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8823219), filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 2022-11-30 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - 2022-11-30 Complaint & Jury Demand, #3 Exhibit A - 2022-11-30 Summons, #4 Exhibit A - 2022-11-30 Notice of Address Change, #5 Exhibit A - Register of Actions and Party Information-Boulder)(Seibel, Taylor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Garcia
Represented By: Brett Emil Myers
Represented By: John G. Taussig, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company doing business as Owners Insurance Company
Represented By: Taylor Robert Seibel
Represented By: John David Mereness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?