Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. v. Day
| Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. |
| Derrick E Day |
| 1:2022cv03186 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Filed by Derrick E Day.(Dickey, Jonathan) |
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Plaintiff may file an objection no later than 11:00 a.m. on January 5, 2023. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 1/4/2023. Text Only Entry (dddlc6, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint for Fourteen Days by Defendant Derrick E Day. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Dickey, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on December 19, 2022. Pursuant to the Order of Reference (ECF 7 ), this Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on March 20, 2023 at 10:30 a.m., in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the parties and any unrepresented non-prisoner parties in this case are to hold a meeting in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before March 10, 2023 and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order. The parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures, no later than five business days prior to the Scheduling Conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in editable Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Hegarty at hegarty_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. (alave, )
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.. Derrick E Day served on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023. (Duvall, Jody) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 12/13/2022. Text Only Entry. (rkeec)
|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Duvall, Jody) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael Christopher Payne on behalf of Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.Attorney Michael Christopher Payne added to party Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.(pty:pla) (Payne, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Jody N. Duvall. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Manage my Account tab at the PACER website at https://www.pacer.gov/, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry). (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Derrick E Day (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8823821)Attorney Jody Nicholas Duvall added to party Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Summons, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duvall, Jody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. v. Day | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Christopher Payne |
| Represented By: | Jody Nicholas Duvall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Derrick E Day | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Michael Dickey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
