Armbruster v. Gaia, Inc. et al
| Dana Armbruster |
| Gaia, Inc., Jirka Rysavy and Paul Tarell |
| 1:2022cv03267 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/15/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #8 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-03267-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Dana Armbruster All parties do not consent.. (Kim, Phillip) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on December 20, 2022. Consent Form due by 2/14/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/21/2023 Scheduling Conference set for 2/28/2023 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (csarr, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Paul Tarell re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Dana Armbruster. (Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Jirka Rysavy re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Dana Armbruster. (Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Gaia, Inc. re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Dana Armbruster. (Kim, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GAIA, INC., Jirka Rysavy, Paul Tarell (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8841830)Attorney Phillip C. Kim added to party Dana Armbruster(pty:pla), filed by Dana Armbruster. (Attachments: #1 PSLRA Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kim, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
