Johnson v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
| Mary Jo Johnson |
| Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel L. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes, Nick S. Cyprus, Roxanne Decyk, Joanne O. Isham, C. Robert Kehler, L. Roger Mason, Jr., Eric J. Zahler, Eddy Zervigon, Gilman Louie and Heather Wilson |
| 1:2023cv00383 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ADVISORY NOTICE TO ATTORNEY AND COURT: Marc L. Ackerman failed to pay the 2022 Biennial Fee. Under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3(a) and District Court General Order 2022-7, counsel was administratively removed from the court's attorney roll. Counsel must submit another bar application though PACER, pay the application fee, and, upon reinstatement, file a Notice of Entry of Appearance to continue as counsel of record in this case. Please visit and fully review the 2022 Biennial Renewal Fee page before contacting the Court for assistance (Biennial / Renewal Fee Information | US District Court of Colorado (uscourts.gov)). (Text Only Entry) (ashee) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Continue. The Scheduling Conference set for 4/5/2023 is VACATED and RESET for 7/6/2023 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/29/2023. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/28/2023. Text Only Entry(stvlc4, )
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM regarding #9 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Unopposed Motion to Adjourn Scheduling Conference filed by Mary Jo Johnson. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/28/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Unopposed Motion to Adjourn Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Mary Jo Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) [Proposed] Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Adjourn Scheduling Conference)(Ackerman, Marc) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Mary Jo Johnson All parties do not consent.. (Ackerman, Marc) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mary Jo Johnson. Nick S. Cyprus waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Roxanne Decyk waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Howell M. Estes waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Joanne O. Isham waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Daniel L. Jablonsky waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; C. Robert Kehler waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Gilman Louie waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; L. Roger Mason, Jr waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Maxar Technologies, Inc. waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Heather Wilson waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Eric J. Zahler waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023; Eddy Zervigon waiver sent on 2/22/2023, answer due 4/23/2023. (Ackerman, Marc) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (jcharl, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 13 February 2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/29/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 4/5/2023 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/10/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Summons not issued. All parties listed in the caption of the complaint must also be listed in the caption of the summons. Please submit a new summons listing all parties using the SUMMONS REQUEST event type. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nick S. Cyprus, Roxanne Decyk, Howell M. Estes, Joanne O. Isham, Daniel J. Jablonsky, C. Robert Kehler, Gilman Louie, L. Roger Mason, Jr, Maxar Technologies, Inc., Heather Wilson, Eric J. Zahler, Eddy Zervigon (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8931698)Attorney Marc L. Ackerman added to party Mary Jo Johnson(pty:pla), filed by Mary Jo Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit FRCP 7.1 Statement, #3 Summons Summons Request)(Ackerman, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
