Fenton et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Plaintiff: Gary A. Fenton and Angela K. Fenton
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Professional Transportation, Inc., Michael Jeep and Jesus Ruiz Murillo
Case Number: 1:2023cv00514
Filed: February 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting #22 Defendants UPRR, PTI, and Jeep's Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. For good cause shown, the Scheduling Conference set for 4/26/2023 is VACATED and RESET for 6/20/2023 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. The parties' joint Proposed Scheduling Order is now due 6/13/2023. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/18/23. Text Only Entry(stvlc3, Andrew)
April 18, 2023 Filing 23 MEMORANDUM regarding #22 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference filed by Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company, Michael Jeep. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/18/2023. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
April 18, 2023 Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Defendants Michael Jeep, Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Kuznitz, Lynn)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/13/2023. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
April 13, 2023 Filing 20 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #19 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00514-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (csarr, )
April 12, 2023 Filing 19 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Michael Jeep, Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company All parties do not consent.. (Reitman, Andrew)
April 5, 2023 Filing 18 Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Company, Professional Transportation, Inc. and Michael Jeep's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Defenses, Jury Demand, and, CROSSCLAIM against Jesus Ruiz Murillo by Michael Jeep, Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Reitman, Andrew)
April 5, 2023 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Reitman, Andrew)
April 5, 2023 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Reitman, Andrew)
April 5, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew Puschel Reitman on behalf of Michael JeepAttorney Andrew Puschel Reitman added to party Michael Jeep(pty:dft) (Reitman, Andrew)
April 5, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Lynn Rose Kuznitz on behalf of Michael JeepAttorney Lynn Rose Kuznitz added to party Michael Jeep(pty:dft) (Kuznitz, Lynn)
March 23, 2023 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Michael Jeep served on 3/22/2023, answer due 4/12/2023. (Vucinovich, James)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting the #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension by Defendants Union Pacific Railroad Company ("UPRR") and Professional Transportation, Inc. ("PTI"). For good cause shown, Defendants UPRR and PTI shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint not later than 4/5/2023. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/20/23. Text Only Entry(stvlc3, Andrew)
March 20, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew Puschel Reitman on behalf of Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad CompanyAttorney Andrew Puschel Reitman added to party Professional Transportation, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Puschel Reitman added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft) (Reitman, Andrew)
March 20, 2023 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Kuznitz, Lynn)
March 20, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Lynn Rose Kuznitz on behalf of Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad CompanyAttorney Lynn Rose Kuznitz added to party Professional Transportation, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Lynn Rose Kuznitz added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft) (Kuznitz, Lynn)
March 15, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 3/1/2023, answer due 3/22/2023. (Vucinovich, James)
March 15, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Professional Transportation, Inc. served on 3/1/2023, answer due 3/22/2023. (Vucinovich, James)
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 27 February 2023. Consent Form due by 4/12/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 4/19/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 4/26/2023 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
February 27, 2023 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, )
February 27, 2023 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00514-STV. (athom, )
February 27, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) Modified on 2/27/2023 to correct docket (norlin, ).
February 27, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
February 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Jeep, Jesus Ruiz Murillo, Professional Transportation, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8958846)Attorney James K. Vucinovich added to party Angela K. Fenton(pty:pla), Attorney James K. Vucinovich added to party Gary A. Fenton(pty:pla), filed by Angela K. Fenton, Gary A. Fenton. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vucinovich, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fenton et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary A. Fenton
Represented By: James K. Vucinovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela K. Fenton
Represented By: James K. Vucinovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Andrew Puschel Reitman
Represented By: Lynn Rose Kuznitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: Lynn Rose Kuznitz
Represented By: Andrew Puschel Reitman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Jeep
Represented By: Andrew Puschel Reitman
Represented By: Lynn Rose Kuznitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesus Ruiz Murillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?