Aramendia v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company et al
| Sebastian Aramendia |
| Progressive Direct Insurance Company, The Progressive Corporation and Progressive Corporation, The |
| 1:2023cv00663 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| S Kato Crews |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 6/15/2023 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order AND email a copy in Word document format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, 7 days before the scheduled conference (on or before 6/8/2023). The Magistrate Judge #6 Consent Form is also due by 6/8/2023 and must be filed separately from the proposed scheduling order.The parties are directed to call in for this Telephonic Scheduling Conference using the dial-in information:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814#SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/18/2023. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #3 Complaint and Jury Demand by Progressive Corporation, The, Progressive Direct Insurance Company.(Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 9 ADVISORY NOTICE TO ATTORNEY AND COURT: Attorney Barry I. Dunn attempted to enter his appearance in this case by affixing his "s/" signature to ECF Docket Entry No. 8. Counsel was administratively removed from the attorney roll for failing to pay the 2022 Biennial Fee. Under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a)(5), counsel's purported appearance cannot be recognized. Counsel must file a Notice of Entry of Appearance upon obtaining readmission to the Court's bar should he wish to participate further in any proceedings in this case. Please visit and fully review the 2022 Biennial Renewal Fee page before contacting the court for assistance: #Biennial / Renewal Fee Information | US District Court of Colorado (uscourts.gov). (Text Only Entry) (mfred) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendants Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Progressive Corporation, The. Progressive Direct Insurance Company answer due 4/11/2023; Progressive Corporation, The answer due 4/11/2023. (Schneider, Laura) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/15/2023. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (blaws) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, Complaint, and Civil Cover Sheet upon CT Corporation Systems on 2/21/2023. (blaws) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Progressive Direct Insurance Company, The Progressive Corporation, filed by Sebastian Aramendia. (blaws) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (blaws) Modified on 3/15/2023 to correct date filed. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Progressive Direct Insurance Company, The Progressive Corporation from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2022CV30801. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8990304), filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company, The Progressive Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Periodic Report, #4 Exhibit Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit CCEF Docket Sheet, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schneider, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
