Hastings v. Hass
Brian Hastings |
Danyelle Hass, Sterling Police Dept Officer, Kathy McLaughlin, John Sheldon and Ian LNU |
1:2023cv00691 |
March 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Kristen L Mix |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 6 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Brian Hastings. (angar, ) |
Filing 5 AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT against Danyelle Hass, filed by Brian Hastings.(sdunb, ) |
|
Filing 3 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the recent appointment of Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher as a United States District Judge, and with the permission of Chief Judge Brimmer pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), this action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00691-KLM. (Text only entry) (kmyha) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Brian Hastings. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tgall, ) Prisoner Complaint Packet Mailed USPS as Requested by Filer. Modified to corrected docket text on 3/17/2023 (tgall, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.