Serna et al v. City of Colorado Springs
Francisco Serna and Ajhalei Snoddy |
City of Colorado Springs |
1:2023cv00728 |
March 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
Daniel D Domenico |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 16 MOTION to Stay Discovery and to Vacate Scheduling Conference by Defendant City of Colorado Springs. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Turner, Anne) |
![]() |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant City of Colorado Springs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Colo. Condemn. Docket, #2 Exhibit Colo. Pet. in Condemnation, #3 Exhibit Colo. IP Hearing Tr. Excerpts, #4 Exhibit Colo IP Hearing Ex. 8 - Constr. Drawing, #5 Exhibit Colo IP Hearing Ex. 12 - Council Resolution, #6 Exhibit Colo Oct 2017 Ord. Re IP, #7 Exhibit WD Tex Compl, #8 Exhibit WD Tex Am Compl, #9 Exhibit WD Tex City Mot. to Dismiss, #10 Exhibit WD Tex Pl. Resp to City Mot. to Dismiss, #11 Exhibit WD Tex Pl Obj to MJ Rpt. and Recomm., #12 Exhibit WD Tex City Resp to Pl Obj, #13 Exhibit Tex Final Judgment, #14 Exhibit Texas Action Docket, #15 Exhibit Colo Mot to Dismiss re URA, #16 Exhibit Colo City Resp. to Mot to Dismiss re URA, #17 Exhibit Colo Removed Case Docket, #18 Exhibit Colo Reply to Mot to Dismiss re URA, #19 Exhibit Colo Ord Denying Mot to Dismiss re URA, #20 Exhibit Colo Comm'rs Verdict)(Turner, Anne) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Mailing via U.S. Mail by Clerk #12 Order Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (including attachment-VTC instructions) to Francisco Serna 10107 FM 969 Austin, TX 78724 (cc: Ajhalei Snoddy at same address). Text Only Entry (evaug ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendant City of Colorado Springs. (Turner, Anne) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Request for Preliminary Relief Under Fed.R.Civ.Proc. Rule 65 Request for Order Requiring Review Appraiser by Plaintiffs Francisco Serna, Ajhalei Snoddy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (athom, ) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge William J. Martinez This case is randomly returned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-728-DDD (angar, ) |
Filing 5 This case was assigned incorrectly. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, the case has been directly reassigned to William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00728-WJM (Text only entry.) see case number 22-cv-02998-WJM-MDB. (jcharl, ) |
Filing 4 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00728-MDB. (Text only entry.) (jcharl, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Injunction against City of Colorado Springs Filing Fee: $402.00 Receipt Number:106391, filed by Francisco Serna, Ajhalei Snoddy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jcharl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.