Priest v. Wheat Ridge City Police Department et al
Clinton Priest and Clinton Eugene Priest |
Wheat Ridge Police Department, Austin Pittman, Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Brian McCarthy, Wheat Ridge City Police Department and Briann McCarthy |
1:2023cv00746 |
March 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Kristen L Mix |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on May 10, 2023. For the reasons set forth herein, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's federal claims in the Petition for Complaint and Notice of Claim (ECF No. #8 ) be dismissed and that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims. (csarr, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on May 10, 2023. (csarr, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on May 9, 2023. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (csarr, ) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on April 13, 2023. The Prisoner Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #15 ) submitted by Plaintiff and filed on April 11, 2023, is DENIED without prejudice as premature because the case remains under initial review.(csarr, ) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Removal Reply by Plaintiff Clinton Eugene Priest (csarr, ) |
Filing 15 PRISONER MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Clinton Eugene Priest. (csarr, ) |
Filing 14 NOTICE DEFENDANTS' D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 FILING by Defendants Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Briann McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge City Police Department (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Register of Actions, #2 Exhibit B - State Court filing re notice of removal)(Ziporin, Eric) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER. Defendants' #12 Motion for Extension of Responsive Pleading Deadline Pending Pro Se Review filed March 31, 2023, is GRANTED and Defendants' deadline to answer, if necessary, is extended to seven days following the Court's completion of initial review of this matter pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b). By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/31/2023.(jtorr, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #8 Complaint by Defendants Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Briann McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge City Police Department. (Kadolph, James) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Mr. Priest fails to show good cause within the time allowed the action may be dismissed without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/29/2023. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 10 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the recent appointment of Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher as a United States District Judge, and with the permission of Chief Judge Brimmer pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), this action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00746-KLM. (Text only entry) (agarc, ) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Court Paper and Civil Procedure Order upon Wheatridge P.D. on 03/08/2023. (tgall, ) |
Filing 8 PETITION FOR COMPLAINT AND NOTICE OF CLAIM against Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Brian McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge Police Department, filed by Clinton Eugene Priest.(tgall, ) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: ($ 402.00, receipt number 106449). (tgall, ) |
Filing 5 Administrative Notice: No filing fee received with case opening. Attorney contacted with instructions to submit filing fee within 3 hours. (Text Only Entry). (tgall, ) Modified to corrected docket date 3/27/2023 (tgall, ). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by James T. Kadolph on behalf of Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Brian McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge Police Department (Kadolph, James) |
Filing 3 NOTICE CERTIFICATION THAT NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL WAS FILED IN STATE COURT by Defendants Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Brian McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge Police Department (Ziporin, Eric) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendants Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Brian McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge Police Department (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Original Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - ROA, #5 Exhibit E - Affidavit of Service, #6 Exhibit F - Civil Procedure Order, #7 Exhibit G - Mtn for Default Judgment, #8 Exhibit H - Response to Mtn for Default Judgment, #9 Exhibit I - Amended COS, #10 Exhibit J - MOET for Service, #11 Exhibit K - Order Denying Mtn for Summary Judgment, #12 Exhibit L - Order re MOET moot, #13 Exhibit M - Proof of Claim, #14 Exhibit N - ROS on WRPD, #15 Exhibit O - ROS on DePoy, #16 Exhibit P - DePoy Answer, #17 Exhibit Q - Pltf's Added Complaint, #18 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #19 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #20 Continuation of Main Document Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet)(Ziporin, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendants Kyle Boesel, Tyler Clary, Brian McCarthy, Austin Pittman, Wheat Ridge Police Department (Ziporin, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.