Espinoza v. People of the State of Colorado, The et al
Thomas Espinoza |
People of the State of Colorado, The, Mark Fairborn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
1:2023cv00978 |
April 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Kristen L Mix |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION for Objection to the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Thomas Espinoza. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (pklin, ) |
Filing 12 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 24 May 2023. For these reasons, it is respectfully recommended that the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (ECF No. #7 ) be denied and the action dismissed without prejudice based on a lack of jurisdiction. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/23/2023. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-00978-LTB-KLM. (alave, ) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/18/2023. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (alave, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/16/2023. it is ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action #3 is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the subsequently filed Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action [ 8] is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time.(alave, ) |
Filing 8 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Thomas Espinoza. (alave, ) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Thomas Espinoza.(alave, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 04/20/2023. It is ORDERED that Petitioner cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner fails to cure all designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice.(alave, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Thomas Espinoza. (tgall, ) |
Filing 4 Motion to Request for Designation of Record of Restitution Court Costs and Fines: case no.2022sc494 so as to Compile the Record on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 753(F) by Petitioner Thomas Espinoza. (tgall, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 In A Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Thomas Espinoza. (tgall, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 1 Notice of Appeal by Petitioner Thomas Espinoza (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.