United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrews
United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
Tyler L Andrews |
1:2023cv01063 |
April 27, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
S Kato Crews |
Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission All parties consent.. (Hughes, Leslie) |
![]() |
Filing 10 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 1:23-cv-01063-MDB. (Text only entry) (blaws) |
Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 1:23-cv-01063-REB-MDB. (Text only entry) (blaws) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission All parties consent.. (Hughes, Leslie) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission All parties consent.. (Hughes, Leslie) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, ) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-01063-SKC. (athom, ) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (blaws) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
Filing 2 Unopposed MOTION for Judgment as to Tyler Andrews by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Tyler Andrews, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only) for final judgment against Tyler Andrews)(Hughes, Leslie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT And Jury Demand against Tyler L Andrews Attorney Leslie J. Hughes added to party Securities and Exchange Commission(pty:pla), filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet)(Hughes, Leslie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrews | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission | |
Represented By: | Leslie J. Hughes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tyler L Andrews | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.