Klemmer v. Stone Mountain Services et al
| Joel Klemmer |
| Stone Mountain Services and Bruce Phillips |
| 1:2023cv01186 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joel Klemmer. Bruce Phillips served on 6/25/2023, answer due 7/16/2023; Stone Mountain Services served on 6/25/2023, answer due 7/16/2023. (Schimerman, Ryen) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #7 Motion to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2023 is VACATED and RESET for 11/29/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. The Parties' joint Proposed Scheduling Order is now due 11/22/23. The Court NOTES that the instant Order does not extend the time for service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 6/14/23. Text Only Entry(stvlc3, Andrew)
|
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM regarding #7 First MOTION to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference. Motion #7 is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 6/14/2023. Text Only Entry (cnssec. ) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Joel Klemmer. (Schimerman, Ryen) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11 May 2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/29/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2023 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 5/11/2023. Text Only Entry (cnssec.)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Bruce Phillips, Stone Mountain Services by Plaintiff Joel Klemmer. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Schimerman, Ryen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bruce Phillips, Stone Mountain Services (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9096323)Attorney Ryen C. Schimerman added to party Joel Klemmer(pty:pla), filed by Joel Klemmer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schimerman, Ryen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
