Davis v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Christian D. Davis |
| Equifax Information Services LLC and TXU Energy Retail Company LLC |
| 1:2023cv01477 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| S Kato Crews |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Vistra Preferred Inc., Other Affiliate Vistra Asset Company LLC, Other Affiliate Vistra Operations Company LLC, Other Affiliate Vistra Intermediate Company LLC, Other Affiliate Vistra Energy Corp. for TXU Energy Retail Company LLC. (Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV added to party TXU Energy Retail Company LLC(pty:dft) by TXU Energy Retail Company LLC.(Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Cassidy, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Nicholas Michael Cassidy added to party Equifax Information Services LLC(pty:dft) by Equifax Information Services LLC.(Cassidy, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christian D. Davis. TXU Energy Retail Company LLC served on 6/19/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Smith, James) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christian D. Davis. Equifax Information Services LLC served on 6/19/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Smith, James) |
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/12/2023. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9146061)Attorney James Michael Smith added to party Christian D Davis(pty:pla), filed by Christian D Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons Equifax, #3 Summons Summons TXU Energy)(Smith, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
