Slick Slide LLC v. Reed et al
Slick Slide LLC |
Edwin L Reed and Chad L Reeves |
1:2023cv01649 |
June 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
N Reid Neureiter |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE re 2 Administrative Notice, Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff Slick Slide LLC (Schatz, Brett) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Patent, Trademark, or Copyright Action case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party commencing the action to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1. Please file a properly completed Report form, which can be found on the courts website. (Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edwin L Reed, Chad L Reeves (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9171491)Attorney Brett A. Schatz added to party Slick Slide LLC(pty:pla), filed by Slick Slide LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Edwin L Reed, #5 Summons Chad L Reeves)(Schatz, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.