Glaser v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| Beck Glaser |
| Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Does 1 Through 50 |
| 1:2023cv01734 |
| July 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Nina Y Wang |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 BRIEF in Support of #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Zirkle, Lori) |
| Filing 17 BRIEF in Support of #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Declaration of Lori A. Zirkle in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - 6-22-23 Order in the matter of In re Rideshare Cases - JCCP Case No. CJC-005188, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - 8-6-21 Order in the matter of Estate of Stella Yeh v. Uber Techs., Inc., #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - 5-22-20 Order in the matter of Minzer v. Barga - N.Y. Super. Ct. N.Y. Cnty, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - 8-9-21 Order in the matter of Rodriguez v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Fla. Cir. Ct. Osceola Cnty., #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - 11-9-22 Order in the matter of Jane Doe v. Uber Techs., Inc. - N.Y. Super. Ct. Erie Cnty., #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - 11-30-20 Order in the matter of Jane Doe No. 1 v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty., #7 Exhibit Exhibit G - 12-7-21 Order in the matter of Lopez v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. Santa Clara Cnty., #8 Exhibit Exhibit H - 5-13-21 Order in the matter of Polanco v. Lyft, Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. Orange Cnty., #9 Exhibit Exhibit I - 4-14-21 Order in the matter of Toral v. Bazzi - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty. Apr. 14, 2021, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J - 3-10-23 Order in the matter of Jacobs v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. Alameda Cnty., #11 Exhibit Exhibit K - 9-27-22 Order in the matter of Luna v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty., #12 Exhibit Exhibit L - 4-7-22 Order in the matter of Shannon v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty., #13 Exhibit Exhibit M - 3-9-22 Order in the matter of Baumgartner v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Wash. Super. Ct. King Cnty., #14 Exhibit Exhibit N - 6-14-21 Order in the matter of Garcia v. Peninsula Intl, Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. San Mateo Cnty., #15 Exhibit Exhibit O - July 7-20-21 Tent. Ruling & 7-21-20 Final Order in the matter of Jane Doe v. Uber Techs., Inc., #16 Exhibit Exhibit P - 10-22-21 Order in the matter of Burmakova v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty, #17 Exhibit Exhibit Q - 1-29-21 Order in the matter of Jane Doe v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty., #18 Exhibit Exhibit R - 10-25-18 Order in the matter of Flynn v. Bagumyan, - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty., #19 Exhibit Exhibit S - 3-18-21 Order in the matter of Cho v. McEwan - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty, #20 Exhibit Exhibit T - 4-21-21 Order in the matter of Echevarria v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Fla. Cir. Ct. Miami-Dade Cnty., #21 Exhibit Exhibit U - 3-11-21 Order in the matter of Owens v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Pa. Ct. C.P. Berks Cnty., #22 Exhibit Exhibit V - 6-12-20 Order in the matter of Coughlin v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Pa. Ct. C.P. Philadelphia Cnty., #23 Exhibit Exhibit W - 2-14-23 Order in the matter of Robinson v. Uber USA, LLC - S.C. Ct. C.P. Richmond Cnty, #24 Exhibit Exhibit X - 6-1-23 Order in the matter of Ramos v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty, #25 Exhibit Exhibit Y - 3-22-22 Order in the matter of Flores v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty., #26 Exhibit Exhibit Z - 3-8-22 Order in the matter of Norman v. Uber Techs., Inc. - Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty.)(Zirkle, Lori) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Zirkle, Lori) |
Filing 15
PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 22 August 2023. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 14
REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella upon her appointment. All future pleadings should reference Magistrate Judge Starnella at the end of the civil action number (such as 23-cv-01734-NYW-KAS). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Magistrate Judge Starnella in Courtroom C-204. Her chambers are located in Room C-253 of the Byron G. Rogers Courthouse. Her telephone number is 303-335-2770. (Text only entry) (agarc, )
|
|
Filing 13
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 31 July 2023. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #10 is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint is extended to September 1, 2023.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint) filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/28/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, ) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Zirkle, Lori) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint) by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Zirkle, Lori) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance (Notice of Appearance) by Lori Ann Zirkle on behalf of Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.Attorney Lori Ann Zirkle added to party Rasier, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Lori Ann Zirkle added to party Uber Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft) (Zirkle, Lori) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Beck Glaser. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Return of Service of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Return of Service of Defendant Rasier, LLC)(Nimmo, Michael) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2) by Plaintiff Beck Glaser. (Nimmo, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 07/11/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 9/14/2023. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 9/21/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (alave, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/10/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER: Under Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "[i]n an action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a), a party... must, unless the court orders otherwise, file a disclosure statement" that "name[s]--and identif[ies] the citizenship of--every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor." Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, within seven days of each Party's appearance in this case, they SHALL FILE a Rule 7.1 disclosure statement identifying their respective states of citizenship. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/10/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9185809)Attorney Michael Lee Nimmo added to party Beck Glaser(pty:pla), filed by Beck Glaser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Nimmo, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
