Drake v. Amerisure Partners Insurance Company
| M Alexander Drake |
| Amerisure Partners Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv01916 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response to #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Amerisure Partners Insurance Company. (Goldstein, Adam) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff M Alexander Drake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit February 4, 2022 email, #2 Exhibit May 10, 2022 Letter, #3 Exhibit July 15, 2022 email, #4 Exhibit September 1, 2022 Letter, #5 Exhibit December 12, 2022 Letter, #6 Exhibit February 1, 2023 Letter, #7 Exhibit March 9, 2023 Letter, #8 Exhibit April 10, 2023 Letter)(Earl, Collin) |
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/8/2023 re: #15 Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Amerisure Partners Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Court's practice standards. The Practice Standards state that "[a]ll motions, objections (including objections to the recommendations or orders of United States Magistrate Judges), responses, and briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages." Id. III.A. Plaintiff's response is 24 pages. Plaintiff shall file a complying response on or before September 12, 2023. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 17 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: #15 Response to Motion filed by attorney Collin Joseph Earl. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(d) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix to all documents an electronic s/signature and signature block in compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(d) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify by Plaintiff M Alexander Drake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Order Re: Amended Complaint)(Earl, Collin) |
| Filing 15 STRICKEN RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff M Alexander Drake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Earl, Collin) Modified on 9/8/2023 (pabsec, ). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/25/2023 re: #13 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss #11 on or before September 7, 2023. For future requests for extension of time, counsel is reminded that, pursuant to I.G.2 of this Court's Practice Standards, "[a]ny motion for extension of time shall be filed no later than three business days before the date the motion, response, reply, or other paper is due." Text Only Entry(pabsec, )
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Plaintiff M Alexander Drake. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document)(Earl, Collin) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/4/2023 re: #9 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an up to 17-Page-Long Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Text Only Entry.(jtorr, )
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Amerisure Partners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Goldstein, Adam) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Collin Joseph Earl on behalf of M Alexander DrakeAttorney Collin Joseph Earl added to party M Alexander Drake(pty:pla) (Earl, Collin) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Defendant Amerisure Partners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Goldstein, Adam) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (tgall, ) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons for Amerisure Partners Insurance Company, Exhibit 1(TAR); Exhibit 2 (Amerisure Policy/82 PGS); Complaint, District Court Civil (CV) Case Cover Sheet For Initial Pleading of Complaint, Counterclaim, Cross-Claim Or Third-Party Complaint upon Amerisure Partners Insurance Company on 06/06/2023. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Amerisure Partners Insurance Company, filed by M Alexander Drake.(tgall, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 4 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry). (tgall, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by E. Catlynne Shadakofsky on behalf of Amerisure Partners Insurance CompanyAttorney E. Catlynne Shadakofsky added to party Amerisure Partners Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Shadakofsky, E.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Adam Joseph Goldstein on behalf of Amerisure Partners Insurance Company (Goldstein, Adam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Amerisure Partners Insurance Company from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2023CV30465. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-9218329), filed by Amerisure Partners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Civil Cover Sheet-State Court, #2 Exhibit B-Complaint-State Court, #3 Exhibit C-Summons-Amerisure-State Court, #4 Exhibit D-Affidavit of Service-State Court, #5 Exhibit E-Notice of Filing Notice of Removal-State Court, #6 Exhibit F-Accident Report, #7 Exhibit G-Policy, #8 Exhibit H-CO Sec of State-Amerisure, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldstein, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Drake v. Amerisure Partners Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: M Alexander Drake | |
| Represented By: | Collin Joseph Earl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amerisure Partners Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | E. Catlynne Shadakofsky |
| Represented By: | Adam Joseph Goldstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
