Anthony (PS) v. Sterling Correction Facility et al
| Dion Anthony |
| Sterling Correction Facility and Warden of S.C.F. |
| 1:2023cv02137 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan B Prose |
| Susan Prose |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Plaintiff Dion Anthony (cmadr, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 23 August 2023. ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to the Business Office, Attn: Inmate Accounts, North Kern State Prison in Delano, California.((Forms mailed as ordered) cmadr, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan B. Prose. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Dion Anthony. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Sterling Correction Facility, Warden of S.C.F., filed by Dion Anthony. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(norlin, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
