Harper v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Wes Harper |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 1:2023cv02158 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| John L Kane |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 - Americans With Disabilities Act - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation for Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Rubinstein, Jacob) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Rubinstein, Jacob) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION for 21-Day Extension of Time Under Local Civil Rule 6.1 by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Rubinstein, Jacob) |
Filing 8
ORDER finding as moot #7 a Motion entitled Stipulated 21-Day Extension of Time Under Local Civil Rule 6.1. Under D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a), the parties may stipulate to one extension of time of up to 21 days to the time limits otherwise prescribed to respond to discovery requests under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and such a stipulation will be effective on filing without the need for a motion. Ordered by Judge John L. Kane on 9/22/2023. Text Only Entry(jlksec)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond Under Local Civil Rule 6.1 by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Rubinstein, Jacob) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jacob Maxwell Rubinstein on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad CompanyAttorney Jacob Maxwell Rubinstein added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft) (Rubinstein, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wes Harper. Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 9/7/2023, answer due 9/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Proof of Service)(Murray, Steven) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (jcharl, ) #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ). |
| Filing 3 DISREGARD, FILED IN ERROR Modified to note error on 9/6/2023 (jcharl, ). |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge John L. Kane and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Jury Trial against Union Pacific Railroad Company (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9260314)Attorney Steven Lee Murray added to party Wes Harper(pty:pla), filed by Wes Harper. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Murray, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harper v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wes Harper | |
| Represented By: | Steven Lee Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Maxwell Rubinstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
