Belford v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
| Mitchell Belford |
| USAA Casualty Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv02161 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 7/24/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 8/12/2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 10/18/2023. (evaug)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant USAA Casualty Insurance Company. (Freda, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant USAA Casualty Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Riter, Tory) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER to #3 Complaint by USAA Casualty Insurance Company.(Riter, Tory) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Steven Roche on behalf of Mitchell BelfordAttorney Matthew Steven Roche added to party Mitchell Belford(pty:pla) (Roche, Matthew) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/18/2023. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 8/25/2023. (evaug)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Freda, Matthew) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/24/2023. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (norlin, ) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 STATE COURT ORDER - Order re " Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint was granted by El Paso County District Court Judge, David A. Gilbert on 8/15/2023. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Summons upon USAA Casualty Insurance Company on 7/17/2023 (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against USAA Casualty Insurance Company, filed by Mitchell Belford.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by USAA Casualty Insurance Company from District Court, El Paso County, State of Colorado, Case Number 2023CV31383. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-9261309), filed by USAA Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L)(Riter, Tory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Belford v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mitchell Belford | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Steven Roche |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USAA Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Tory Drew Riter |
| Represented By: | Matthew Robert Freda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
