Davis (PS) v. USA et al
| Eleke Davis |
| USA and Timothy Roland Brown |
| 1:2023cv02205 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Susan Prose |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 31 August 2023. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the instant action is dismissed without prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court file in case number 23-cv-02006- STV a copy of the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and attachments filed in this action. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 4 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #3 Order of Recusal. This case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-02205-STV. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 30 August 2023. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Timothy Roland Brown, USA (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: 108037), filed by Eleke Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Cover Letter Re: Return of Filed Complaint, #3 Declaration of Deposit, #4 Envelope) (blaws) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
