Martinez v. Walgreen Co.
| Kathy Martinez |
| Walgreen Co., d/b/a Walgreens and Walgreen, Co. doing business as Walgreens |
| 1:2023cv02227 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Susan Prose |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: All motions concerning the testimony of expert witnesses raising issues under Fed. R. Evid. 401, 702, 703, 704, or 705 as codified and construed shall be filed by July 19, 2024. A combined Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference is set 1/16/2025 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Five Day Jury Trial is set 2/3/2025 through 2/7/2025 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/27/2023. (rebsec)
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 10/19/2023. Discovery due by 6/28/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 7/19/2024. (trvo, )
|
| Filing 15 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 10/19/2023. FTR: C205. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Walgreen, Co.. (Kaluk, Mary) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/6/2023. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Senior Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan B. Prose. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-2227-REB. (Text Only Entry) (angar, ) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Walgreen, Co. All parties do not consent.. (Kaluk, Mary) |
|
Filing 10
Order Setting Consent Deadline and Scheduling Conference, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 9/8/2023. If the parties have not done so already, they shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form on or before October 5, 2023. The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held telephonically on October 19, 2023, at 2:00 p.m.., in Courtroom C-205, on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall attend by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. All attendees shall please mute their phone when not speaking and not use speaker phone. Counsel for the parties and any unrepresented non-prisoner parties in this case are to hold a meeting in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before September 28, 2023 and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order. (angar, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Lauren E. Varner by Heather E. Hackett on behalf of Kathy Martinez (Hackett, Heather) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Heather E. Hackett by Heather E. Hackett on behalf of Kathy MartinezAttorney Heather E. Hackett added to party Kathy Martinez(pty:pla) (Hackett, Heather) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (blaws) |
| Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT ANSWER and Jury Demand to #5 Complaint, by Walgreen, Co. (blaws) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of Civil Case Cover Sheet, Summons and Complaint upon Walgreen, Co. d/b/a Walgreens on 08/02/2023. (blaws) |
| Filing 5 STATE COURT COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Walgreen, Co., filed by Kathy Martinez. (blaws) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Walgreens Boots Alliance for Walgreen Co., d/b/a Walgreens. (Kaluk, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walgreen Co., d/b/a Walgreens from Weld County District Court, Case Number 2023CV30561. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-9271642), filed by Walgreen Co., d/b/a Walgreens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaluk, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
