Brackney v. Denver Indian Health and Family Services
| Julie Brackney |
| Denver Indian Health and Family Services |
| 1:2023cv02428 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING CONSENT DEADLINE AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 10/23/2023. Consent Form due by 12/6/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/13/2023. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 12/20/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. The parties shall attend by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. All attendees shall please mute their phone when not speaking and not use speaker phone. (trvo, )
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Julie Brackney. Denver Indian Health and Family Services waiver sent on 9/22/2023, answer due 11/21/2023. (Hartley, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (schap, ) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-02428-SBP. (schap, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES :re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Katherine I. Hartley. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must include a complete address as part of the signature block to all future documents in addition to the s/signature. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Denver Indian Health and Family Services (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9299524)Attorney Katherine I. Hartley added to party Julie Brackney(pty:pla), filed by Julie Brackney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Hartley, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brackney v. Denver Indian Health and Family Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julie Brackney | |
| Represented By: | Katherine I. Hartley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Denver Indian Health and Family Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
