Carlisle v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
Samuel Carlisle |
Sovos Brands, Inc., William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman, Jefferson M. Case, Valarie L. Sheppard, David Roberts, Vijayanthimala Singh, Tamer Abuaita and Neha U. Mathur |
1:2023cv02503 |
September 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Scott T Varholak |
Nina Y Wang |
Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal 10/25/2023. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Samuel Carlisle, which is a self-effectuating notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiff's claims were dismissed without prejudice as of the filing of the Notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/25/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Samuel Carlisle (Acocelli, Richard) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 27 September 2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/21/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 11/28/2023 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/26/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tamer Abuaita, Jefferson M. Case, William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman, Neha U. Mathur, David Roberts, Valarie L. Sheppard, Vijayanthimala Singh, Sovos Brands, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9313090)Attorney Richard Adam Acocelli added to party Samuel Carlisle(pty:pla), filed by Samuel Carlisle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Acocelli, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.