Carlisle v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
Samuel Carlisle |
Sovos Brands, Inc., William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman, Jefferson M. Case, Valarie L. Sheppard, David Roberts, Vijayanthimala Singh, Tamer Abuaita and Neha U. Mathur |
1:2023cv02503 |
September 26, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Scott T Varholak |
Nina Y Wang |
Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal 10/25/2023. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Samuel Carlisle (Acocelli, Richard) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tamer Abuaita, Jefferson M. Case, William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman, Neha U. Mathur, David Roberts, Valarie L. Sheppard, Vijayanthimala Singh, Sovos Brands, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9313090)Attorney Richard Adam Acocelli added to party Samuel Carlisle(pty:pla), filed by Samuel Carlisle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Acocelli, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.