Shipman v. Heritage Exposition Services, Inc. et al
Greg Shipman |
Ryan Yemm, Greg Bettag, Heritage Exposition Services Inc and John Bettag |
1:2023cv02512 |
September 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
N Reid Neureiter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ag - Fed. Question - Employment Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Amended Pleading by Plaintiff Greg Shipman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Altis, Daniel) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendants Heritage Exposition Services Inc, John Bettag, Ryan Yemm. All Defendants. (Perkins, Hailey) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Molly W. Keppler on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Molly W. Keppler added to party John Bettag(pty:dft), Attorney Molly W. Keppler added to party Heritage Exposition Services Inc(pty:dft), Attorney Molly W. Keppler added to party Ryan Yemm(pty:dft) (Keppler, Molly) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hailey C. Perkins on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Hailey C. Perkins added to party John Bettag(pty:dft), Attorney Hailey C. Perkins added to party Heritage Exposition Services Inc(pty:dft), Attorney Hailey C. Perkins added to party Ryan Yemm(pty:dft) (Perkins, Hailey) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall promptly serve Defendants. On or before January 10, 2024, the parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form (see Dkt. #4 -3), indicating either unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined. Please note that this date may be earlier than the default deadlines contemplated by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.16(b) shall be held on January 24, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom C-203, Second Floor, Byron G. Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado 8029. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 9/27/2023. (norlin, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Daniel E. Altis. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Manage my Account tab at the PACER website at https://www.pacer.gov/, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number BCODC-9314530)Attorney Daniel Eugene Altis added to party Greg Shipman(pty:pla), filed by Greg Shipman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Summons Bettag summons, #7 Summons Heritage summons, #8 Summons Yemm summons)(Altis, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.