Fusion BPO Services Ltd. v. HomeAdvisor, Inc. et al
| Fusion BPO Services Ltd. |
| HomeAdvisor, Inc., Angi Inc. and CraftJack Inc. |
| 1:2023cv02603 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 12/6/2023 is VACATED and RESET for 1/30/2024 11:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/23/2024. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/1/2023. Text Only Entry(stvlc4, )
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM regarding #10 Joint MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference and Extend Deadline to File Proposed Scheduling Order filed by Fusion BPO Services Ltd. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 11/30/2023. Text Only Entry (schap, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 11/27/2023. Text Only Entry (schap, )
|
| Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #9 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-02603-GPG. (Text Only Entry) (schap, ) |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference and Extend Deadline to File Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Fusion BPO Services Ltd.. (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Fusion BPO Services Ltd. All parties do not consent.. (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE /FRCP 7.1(a)(2) Diversity Disclosure by Plaintiff Fusion BPO Services Ltd. (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Fusion BPO Services Ltd.. All Defendants. (Hollars, Jacob) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Setting Deadline for Filing Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction Form and Setting Scheduling Conference. Consent Form due by 11/22/2023. Citizenship Disclosure Statement due by 11/22/2023. Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/29/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 12/6/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. By Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 10/6/2023. (schap, )
|
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Xplore-Tech Services Pvt. Ltd. for Fusion BPO Services Ltd.. (Hollars, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joshua Caine Dickinson on behalf of Fusion BPO Services Ltd. (Dickinson, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (blaws) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number BCODC-9331291)Attorney Jacob Foster Hollars added to party Fusion BPO Services Ltd.(pty:pla), filed by Fusion BPO Services Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Master Services Agreement, #2 Exhibit ) Exhibit 2 - Amendment to Exhibit A to Master Service Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Second Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Third Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Fourth Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 - Fifth Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 - 6th Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8 - 7th Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9 - 8th Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10 - 9th Amendment to Master Service Agreement, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 11 - 7th Amendment to Master Service Agreement - Form of Statement of Work, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - Statement of Work #2, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 13 - First Addendum to Seventh Amendment, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 14 - Exhibit A to Master Service Agreement Statement of Work #3, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - Exhibit A to Master Service Agreement Statement of Work #4, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 16 - Statement of Work #1, #17 Exhibit ) Exhibit 17 - Amendment to Master Services Agreement, #18 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hollars, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
