MAO, Inc. v. PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff: MAO, Inc.
Defendant: PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv02736
Filed: October 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Kathryn A Starnella
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/12/2023. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, )
December 12, 2023 Filing 21 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #20 Order. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-02736-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 11 December 2023. The signed Consent-Non-Consent Form #19 indicates that at least one party has declined to consent. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to a District Judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(8) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a). (cmadr, )
December 11, 2023 Filing 19 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant PENN Entertainment, Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Miller, Richard)
December 7, 2023 Filing 18 PENN ENTERTAINMENT INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Defendant PENN Entertainment, Inc. (Public Entry for ECF #16 ) (cmadr, )
December 7, 2023 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Miller, Richard)
December 7, 2023 Filing 16 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: by Defendant PENN Entertainment, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Affidavit Declaration)(Miller, Richard)
December 4, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katherine W. Halliday on behalf of MAO, Inc. Attorney Katherine W. Halliday added to party MAO, Inc. (pty:pla) (Halliday, Katherine)
November 20, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Richard William Miller on behalf of PENN Entertainment, Inc. Attorney Richard William Miller added to party PENN Entertainment, Inc. (pty:dft) (Miller, Richard)
November 17, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hara K. Jacobs on behalf of PENN Entertainment, Inc. Attorney Hara K. Jacobs added to party PENN Entertainment, Inc. (pty:dft) (Jacobs, Hara)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 14 November 2023. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint #9 is DENIED as moot. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint is December 7, 2023.(cmadr, )
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 13 November 2023. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/1/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 1/8/2024 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document) (cmadr, )
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4), the deadline to file the Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form [#4-1] is December 26, 2023. by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 11/13/2023. Text Only Entry (kaslc2, )
November 10, 2023 Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant PENN Entertainment, Inc.. (Jimenez, Chad)
October 31, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MAO, Inc.. PENN Entertainment, Inc. served on 10/26/2023, answer due 11/16/2023. (Scialdone, John)
October 23, 2023 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Scialdone, John)
October 20, 2023 Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Refiled version of ECF #5 to ensure proper noticing.) (cmadr, )
October 20, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff MAO, Inc. (Scialdone, John)
October 20, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (ccuen, )
October 19, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry. (ccuen, )
October 19, 2023 Filing 2 Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Patent, Trademark, or Copyright Action case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party commencing the action to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1. Please file a properly completed Report form, which can be found on the courts website. (Text Only Entry) (ccuen, )
October 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PENN Entertainment, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number BCODC-9353080)Attorney John A. Scialdone added to party MAO, Inc. (pty:pla), filed by MAO, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Scialdone, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAO, Inc. v. PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAO, Inc.
Represented By: John A. Scialdone
Represented By: Katherine W. Halliday
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Represented By: Chad Phillip Jimenez
Represented By: Hara K. Jacobs
Represented By: Richard William Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?