Miller (PS) v. Lengrich et al
No Named Respondent |
Haywood Eugene Miller |
Jason Lengrich and State of Colorado |
1:2023cv02741 |
October 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Susan Prose |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #12 Order to File Pre-Answer Response and #11 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (jtorr, ) |
|
Filing 11 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Haywood Eugene Miller.(schap, ) |
|
Filing 9 Letter re: MOTION for Clarity, by Petitioner Haywood Eugene Miller. (angar, ) |
Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 108817 (efoga, ) |
|
Filing 6 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Petitioner Haywood Eugene Miller. (schap, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Haywood Eugene Miller. (schap, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Haywood Eugene Miller. (Attachments: #1 Letter Re: Filing Fee, #2 Statement of Claims)(schap, ) |
|
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 1 LETTER by Petitioner Haywood Eugene Miller. (tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.