Fitzsimmons (PS) v. O'Hara et al
| Anne Fitzsimmons |
| Michael (I) O'Hara and Michael O'Hara |
| 1:2023cv02756 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Susan Prose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #9 ) and Plaintiffs Motion for Court to Reconsider Order of Dismissal (ECF No. #8 ) are DENIED. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/6/2023.(norlin, )
|
| Filing 11 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Cure Deficiencies, #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Reconsider Order of Dismissal filed by Anne Fitzsimmons. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 10 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #9 MOTION for Order to, #8 MOTION for Order to filed by attorney Anne Fitzsimmons. The document was not filed electronically. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.1(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Reconsider Order of Dismissal by Plaintiff Anne Fitzsimmons. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Cure Deficiencies by Plaintiff Anne Fitzsimmons. (norlin, ) Modified on 12/4/2023 to correct spelling (norlin, ). |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #6 Order Dismissing Case by Clerk on 11/30/2023. (norlin, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order and failure to prosecute. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/30/2023. (norlin, )
|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Service by Plaintiff Anne Fitzsimmons of Complaint on Defendant (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Plaintiff Anne Fitzsimmons (norlin, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 10/24/2023. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against Michael O'Hara, Michael (I) O'Hara, filed by Anne Fitzsimmons.(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
