Egbune v. Baum et al
Chuck O. Egbune |
Andrew Baum, Douglas County Public Trustee, Always Enterprises, Inc doing business as A-1 Bail Bonds and Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC |
1:2023cv02830 |
October 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Philip A Brimmer |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Absence Based on Religious Ground, by Plaintiff Chuck O. Egbune (angar, ) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 by Plaintiff Chuck O. Egbune. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued via USPS to Plaintiff by Clerk. (blaws) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Chuck O. Egbune. Plaintiff does not consent. (blaws) |
Filing 2 VERIFIED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and a Request for a Forthwith Hearing of Same, by Plaintiff Chuck O. Egbune. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (blaws) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Always Enterprises, Inc, Andrew Baum, Douglas County Public Trustee (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: 108668), filed by Chuck O. Egbune. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (blaws) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.