Wakem v. Circ-Cell Skincare, LLC
Matthew Wakem |
Circ-Cell Skincare, LLC |
1:2023cv02967 |
November 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Charlotte N Sweeney |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the notice of dismissal filed in this case on 12/13/23 at ECF No. #15 . Text Only Entry (jdyne) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case with Prejudice by Plaintiff Matthew Wakem (Miller, Jay) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER re: #13 Notice of Settlement. In light of the Notice of Settlement, the Court orders that the parties submit a Dismissal Paper on or before 12/29/2023. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 11/29/2023. Text Only Entry (cnsja.) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Plaintiff Matthew Wakem (Miller, Jay) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond. Defendant is ORDERED to file its answer or other response on or before 1/4/2024. The Court notes, however, that the Motion fails to comply fully with the Local Rules. See, e.g., D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(c). The parties are cautioned that future filings that do not comply fully with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, and the judicial Practice Standards may be stricken. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/27/2023. Text Only Entry (skclc3) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint. Motion #10 is referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 11/27/2023. Text Only Entry (cnsja. ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Matthew Wakem. (Miller, Jay) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Wakem. Circ-Cell Skincare, LLC served on 11/13/2023, answer due 12/4/2023. (Miller, Jay) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 11/13/2023. Text Only Entry (cnsja. ) |
Filing 7 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to #5 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-02967-CNS. (Text Only Entry) (sphil, ) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Matthew Wakem All parties do not consent.. (Miller, Jay) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dgumb, ) |
Filing 6 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. (dgumb, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (dgumb, ) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Jay Campbell Miller. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must update signature block address by submitting a change of contact request through the Manage my Account tab at the PACER website at https://www.pacer.gov/, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement - Injunctive Relief Demanded against Circ-Cell Skincare, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-9386856)Attorney Jay Campbell Miller added to party Matthew Wakem(pty:pla), filed by Matthew Wakem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Interested Persons, #5 Form AO-121, #6 Summons)(Miller, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wakem v. Circ-Cell Skincare, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Wakem | |
Represented By: | Jay Campbell Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Circ-Cell Skincare, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.