Bidinger v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
| Robert Bidinger |
| Raytheon Technologies Corporation doing business as RTX Corporation |
| 1:2023cv03181 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/19/2024.(jtorr, )
|
| Filing 11 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Raytheon Technologies Corporation.(Torres, Jason) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney of Record by Plaintiff Robert Bidinger. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Written Advisements)(Neeper, Eric) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation. Raytheon Technologies Corporation answer due 12/28/2023. (Torres, Jason) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Torres, Jason) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jason Mathew Torres on behalf of Raytheon Technologies CorporationAttorney Jason Mathew Torres added to party Raytheon Technologies Corporation(pty:dft) (Torres, Jason) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (jtorr, ) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/4/2023. Magistrate Judge Consent Form due 1/31/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/31/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 2/7/2024 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (jtorr, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Raytheon Technologies Corporation d/b/a RTX Corporation re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Robert Bidinger. (Sanchez, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Robert Bidinger (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9421676)Attorney Joseph Patrick Sanchez added to party Robert Bidinger(pty:pla), filed by Robert Bidinger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanchez, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bidinger v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Bidinger | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Patrick Sanchez |
| Represented By: | Eric Joseph Neeper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Raytheon Technologies Corporation doing business as RTX Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jason Mathew Torres |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
