Jiang v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
Plaintiff: Rake W. Jiang
Defendant: Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
Case Number: 1:2023cv03204
Filed: December 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Susan Prose
Referring Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2024 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Melisa Hallie Panagakos added to party Comtech Telecommunications Corp.(pty:dft) by Comtech Telecommunications Corp..(Panagakos, Melisa)
February 1, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Emely Yessiel Garcia on behalf of Comtech Telecommunications Corp.Attorney Emely Yessiel Garcia added to party Comtech Telecommunications Corp.(pty:dft) (Garcia, Emely)
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan B. Prose. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 12/5/2023. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
December 5, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, )
December 4, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, )
December 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9425542)Attorney Justin Michael Plaskov added to party Rake W. Jiang(pty:pla), filed by Rake W. Jiang. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Plaskov, Justin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jiang v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rake W. Jiang
Represented By: Justin Michael Plaskov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
Represented By: Emely Yessiel Garcia
Represented By: Melisa Hallie Panagakos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?