Staton v. DeJoy
| Darlette "Dee" Staton |
| Louis DeJoy |
| 1:2023cv03223 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Susan Prose |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Benjamin Henry Gibson on behalf of Louis DeJoyAttorney Benjamin Henry Gibson added to party Louis DeJoy(pty:dft) (Gibson, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Leslie Carol Schulze on behalf of Louis DeJoyAttorney Leslie Carol Schulze added to party Louis DeJoy(pty:dft) (Schulze, Leslie) |
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/08/2023. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Darlette Staton (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9428248)Attorney Timothy James Turner added to party Darlette Staton(pty:pla), filed by Darlette Staton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Staton EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Notice of Final Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet cover sheet, #4 Summons summons)(Turner, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Staton v. DeJoy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darlette "Dee" Staton | |
| Represented By: | Timothy James Turner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Louis DeJoy | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Henry Gibson |
| Represented By: | Leslie Carol Schulze |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
