Thomas (PS) v. No Named Defendant
| Laquesha U Thomas |
| No Named Defendant |
| 1:2023cv03246 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Social Security - SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Exhibits to Complaint, #3 Order (Attachments: #1 Returned Mail) (norlin, ) |
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER In response to the Court's December 11, 2023 Order Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. 3), Plaintiff has submitted a letter (ECF No. 4) and attached numerous exhibits (ECF Nos. 4-1, 4-2, and 4-3). These filings do not cure the designated deficiencies in this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail to Plaintiff, together with a copy of this Minute Order, blank copies of the following court forms: Complaint for Judicial Review of Social Security Decision and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Plaintiff shall complete and submit both forms as directed in the December 11 order to cure. If Plaintiff fails to comply and cure all filing deficiencies, as discussed above, within 30 days from the date of this minute order, this action will be dismissed without further notice. Entered by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 1/11/2024. [Forms mailed as directed] (norlin, )
|
| Filing 4 Exhibits to #1 LETTER Plaintiff Laquesha U Thomas.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit 4)(norlin, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. Plaintiff shall obtain the court-approved Complaint for Review of Social Security Decision and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) forms, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 12/11/2023. (norlin, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 LETTER by Plaintiff Laquesha U Thomas. (efoga, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas (PS) v. No Named Defendant | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laquesha U Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: No Named Defendant | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
