Kajunju (PS) v. Imagine! et al
| Anasa Kajunju |
| Imagine!, Rebecca Novinger and Kim Cortes |
| 1:2023cv03270 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kim Cortes, Imagine!, Rebecca Novinger, filed by Anasa Kajunju. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sphil, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with this Order within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice. Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) is GRANTED. Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 4) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 12/20/2023.(sphil, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, by Plaintiff Anasa Kajunju. (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Plaintiff Anasa Kajunju. (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS against Kim Cortes, Imagine!, Rebecca Novinger, filed by Anasa Kajunju.(dgumb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
