Rodriguez v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Luis Rodriguez |
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company |
1:2023cv03340 |
December 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Susan Prose |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING CONSENT DEADLINE AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/14/2024. Consent Form due by 3/18/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/25/2024. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2024, at 10:00 AM MDT in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. The parties shall attend by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. All attendees shall please mute their phone when not speaking and not use speaker phone. (trvo, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/14/2024. The #9 Order to Show Cause is hereby DISCHARGED. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company.(Kershaw, Brian) |
Filing 10 NOTICE re: Amount in Controversy by Plaintiff Luis Rodriguez (Scott, Danny) |
Filing 9 DISCHARGED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/2/2024. (sbplc3) Modified on 2/14/2024 to discharge pursuant to 12 Order (trvo, ). |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 1/30/2024. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint. Allstate is granted an extension of up to and including 2/12/2024 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. SO ORDERED by U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 1/29/2024. Text Only Entry(skcja, ) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company. (Kershaw, Brian) |
Filing 5 CHANGE IN JUDICIAL OFFICER DESIGNATION. Due to the recent appointment of Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews as a United States District Judge, this action will now be updated to reflect his new designation as District Judge S. Kato Crews. District Judge Crews shall retain assignment to this action as presiding judge and Magistrate Judge Susan Prose is drawn as referral judge. All future pleadings should be designated as 23-cv-03340-SKC. (Text only entry) (agarc, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company by Plaintiff Luis Rodriguez. (Scott, Danny) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9451017)Attorney Danny Ray Scott added to party Luis Rodriguez(pty:pla), filed by Luis Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scott, Danny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Luis Rodriguez | |
Represented By: | Danny Ray Scott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Brian P. Kershaw |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.