Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
| Omer Mohamed |
| Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv03371 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Omer Mohamed. Only Plaintiff consents. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 12 LETTER from Clerk of Court re: Service of Process of #7 Amended Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Rule 4, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(cmadr, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFF A Status Conference shall be held on: April 18, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling any appearance in this court will be entertained unless a written request is made FIVE (5) business days in advance of the date of appearance. The Status Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (571) 353-2301, Access Code 841686937# at the scheduled time. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 2/5/2024. [Order mailed as directed] (norlin, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 2/5/2024. Text Only Entry. (rkeec)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DRAWING CASE. It is ordered that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. It is FURTHER ORDERED that since Plaintiff paid the filing fee, the Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF Nos. #3 , #8 ) are denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/5/2024. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for all further proceedings. (schap, ) Modified on 2/5/2024 to include referral judge (schap, ).
|
| Filing 8 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Omer Mohamed. (schap, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies, Inc., filed by Omer Mohamed.(schap, ) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 109358 (schap, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 12/27/2023. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 4 LETTER by Plaintiff Omer Mohamed. (schap, ) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Omer Mohamed. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies, Inc., filed by Omer Mohamed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Waiver of Service of Summons, #4 Notice of Lawsuit and Request For Waiver of Service of Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Omer Mohamed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
