Medina Morales v. United Airlines Inc. et al
| Aixa Medina Morales |
| United Airlines Inc., Associations of Flight Attendants-CWA and Association of Flight Attendants-CWA |
| 1:2024cv00007 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Contract: Other |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 2114 - Wrongful Discharge From Employment -- Protection From Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS issued by Clerk as to United Airlines Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (sphil, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Unitede Airlines re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Aixa Medina Morales. (Hadden, Maryam) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (sphil, ) |
| Filing 7 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Due to the recent appointment of Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews as a United States District Judge, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan B. Prose. All future pleadings should reference Magistrate Judge Prose at the end of the civil action number (such as 24-cv-00007-CNS-SBP). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained. (Text only entry). (msmot, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to United Airlines, Association of Flight Attendants - CWA re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Aixa Medina Morales. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Hadden, Maryam) |
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 1/3/2024. Text Only Entry (cnsja.)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. (efoga, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Jason A. Kotzker. The s/signature did not match the filers name on the account for which the login and password are registered. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Associations of Flight Attendants-CWA, United Airlines Inc. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9466691)Attorney Jason Aaron Kotzker added to party Aixa Medina Morales(pty:pla), filed by Aixa Medina Morales.(Kotzker, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
