Schlaff v. Surgical Care Affiliates LLC
| Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III |
| Surgical Care Affiliates LLC doing business as SCA Health |
| 1:2024cv00087 |
| January 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III. (Patel, Dipak) |
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #8 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/30/2024. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III All parties consent.. (Patel, Dipak) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Evan H. Smithers on behalf of Surgical Care Affiliates LLCAttorney Evan H. Smithers added to party Surgical Care Affiliates LLC(pty:dft) (Smithers, Evan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Roger Glenn Trim on behalf of Surgical Care Affiliates LLCAttorney Roger Glenn Trim added to party Surgical Care Affiliates LLC(pty:dft) (Trim, Roger) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III. Surgical Care Affiliates LLC waiver sent on 1/11/2024, answer due 3/11/2024. (Patel, Dipak) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/12/2024. Magistrate Judge Consent Form due 3/5/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/5/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 3/12/2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (jtorr, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Surgical Care Affiliates LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9482448)Attorney Dipak Purushottam Patel added to party Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III(pty:pla), filed by Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons in a Civil Action)(Patel, Dipak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schlaff v. Surgical Care Affiliates LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nelson Wilbur Schlaff, III | |
| Represented By: | Dipak Purushottam Patel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Surgical Care Affiliates LLC doing business as SCA Health | |
| Represented By: | Evan H. Smithers |
| Represented By: | Roger Glenn Trim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
