Le Gette v. Action Collection Agencies, Inc.
| Lamar Le Gette |
| Action Collection Agencies, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00137 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER re: #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. Defendant has not yet served an answer nor a motion for summary judgment in this case, thus the Notice complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Under this rule, the Notice is self-effectuating, and Plaintiff's claims were dismissed with prejudice as of the filing of the Notice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/14/2024. (jtorr, )
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case with Prejudice by Plaintiff Lamar Le Gette (Volheim, Nathan) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the #7 Notice of Settlement, the Parties shall file dismissal papers or a status report addressing why dismissal has not been accomplished on or before March 7, 2024. The Court vacates all other pending deadlines and settings. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/6/24. Text Only Entry (mehlc5)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Plaintiff Lamar Le Gette (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lamar Le Gette. Action Collection Agencies, Inc. served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Volheim, Nathan) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/18/2024. Magistrate Judge Consent Form due 3/11/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/11/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 3/18/2024 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (jtorr, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Lamar Le Gette (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Action Collection Agencies, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9490436)Attorney Nathan Charles Volheim added to party Lamar Le Gette(pty:pla), filed by Lamar Le Gette. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Le Gette v. Action Collection Agencies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamar Le Gette | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Action Collection Agencies, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
