Rodriguez-Avila (PS) v. Williams
Blas Rodriguez-Avila |
Williams |
1:2024cv00201 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Susan Prose |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER. It is ORDERED that the action is dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). It is FURTHER ORDERED that the voluntary dismissal is without prejudice and is effective as of February 8, 2024. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/13/2024. (schap, ) |
Filing 11 USPS Certified Mail Return Receipt re #6 Certificate of Service addressed to the United States Attorney General. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Respondent Williams. (Isler, Thomas) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Alan Isler on behalf of WilliamsAttorney Thomas Alan Isler added to party Williams(pty:res) (Isler, Thomas) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 by Petitioner Blas Rodriguez-Avila. (dgumb, ) |
Filing 7 Acknowledgment Letter re: #6 from the United States Attorney's Office. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE for service of process. (Attachments: #1 USPS certified mail receipt) (ccuen, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE. Within twenty-one days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. Within twenty-one days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply if he desires. If Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 1/24/2024. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 1/24/2024.(ccuen, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Blas Rodriguez-Avila. (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Blas Rodriguez-Avila.(efoga, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodriguez-Avila (PS) v. Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Blas Rodriguez-Avila | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Williams | |
Represented By: | Thomas Alan Isler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.