Montgomery v. Hopper et al
M. Scott Montgomery |
Ronnie Hopper and Sharon Hopper |
1:2024cv00228 |
January 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
Susan Prose |
Nina Y Wang |
Contract: Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STATEMENT Plaintiff's Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Plaintiff M. Scott Montgomery. (Montgomery, M.) |
![]() |
Filing 10 LETTER from Clerk of Court re: Service of Process of #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons Ronnie Hopper, #2 Summons Sharon Hopper, #3 Rule 4, #4 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(cmadr, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-00228-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (ccuen, ) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (ccuen, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 109632. (jrobe, ) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ronnie Hopper, Sharon Hopper, filed by M. Scott Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(efoga, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.