Stuart v. Sackett et al
Brook Stuart and Brooke Stuart |
Joseph Sackett, Amanda Winters and Austen Philips |
1:2024cv00248 |
January 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
Nina Y Wang |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MINUTE ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' #20 Proposed Scheduling Order, the Court has determined that a scheduling conference is necessary. Accordingly, a Scheduling Conference is SET for April at 3, 2024 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. The Conference will be conducted by video using the attached instructions. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 03/24/2024. Text Only Entry (mdblc4,) Modified to correct text on 3/25/2024 (jrobe, ). |
Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER: granting #24 Defendants Unopposed Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Defendants Winters and Philips' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to April 5, 2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 03/21/2024. Text Only Entry(mdblc4,) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM regarding #24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Austen Philips, Amanda Winters. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/21/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, ) |
Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Austen Philips, Amanda Winters. (Doherty, Peter) |
Filing 23 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/20/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, ) |
Filing 22 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #21 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge.All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and Drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-00248-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) |
Filing 21 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Brooke Stuart All parties do not consent.. (Oh, Helen) |
Filing 20 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Brooke Stuart. (Oh, Helen) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Peter H. Doherty on behalf of Amanda WintersAttorney Peter H. Doherty added to party Amanda Winters(pty:dft) (Doherty, Peter) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to #7 Complaint and Jury Demand from Defendant Jospeh Sackett and Defendant's Demand for Jury Trial by Joseph Sackett.(Ringel, Andrew) |
Filing 17 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Consent Form due by 3/21/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/21/2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 2/12/2024. (evaug) |
Filing 16 NOTICE DEFENDANTS D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 FILING by Defendant Austen Philips (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket)(Kramer, Courtney) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER: Defendant Ofr. Austen Philip's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Defendant Philips' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to March 22, 2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 02/02/2024. Text Only Entry(mdblc4,) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #7 Complaint by Defendant Austen Philips. (Kramer, Courtney) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Brooke Stuart. (Oh, Helen) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew David Ringel on behalf of Joseph SackettAttorney Andrew David Ringel added to party Joseph Sackett(pty:dft) (Ringel, Andrew) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Brooke Stuart. (Oh, Helen) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Helen S. Oh on behalf of Brooke StuartAttorney Helen S. Oh added to party Brooke Stuart(pty:pla) (Oh, Helen) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by A. Tyrone Glover, Jr on behalf of Brooke StuartAttorney A. Tyrone Glover, Jr added to party Brooke Stuart(pty:pla) (Glover, A.) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (tgall, ) |
Filing 7 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Austen Philips, Joseph Sackett, Amanda Winters, filed by Brooke Stuart.(tgall, ) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. text only entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry). (tgall, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Courtney B. Kramer on behalf of Austen PhilipsAttorney Courtney B. Kramer added to party Austen Philips(pty:dft) (Kramer, Courtney) |
Filing 3 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal,, was Filed in State Court by Defendant Austen Philips (Ziporin, Eric) |
Filing 2 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal,, by Defendant Austen Philips (Ziporin, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Austen Philips from Fremont, Case Number 2023CV3015. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-9508436), filed by Austen Philips. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Waiver of Service-Philips, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Docket, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit E - Delay Reduction Order, #6 Exhibit F - EOA, #7 Exhibit G - EOA, #8 Exhibit H - Summons - Sackett, #9 Exhibit I - Summons - Winters, #10 Exhibit J - Summons - Philips, #11 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment, #13 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Ziporin, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.